Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:44 pm
well if its heridotory explain why my twin sis identical has only 2 stretch marks after 3 kids i have loads after 2 kids on my 3rd now
we seem to have kid within months of each other wether we want to or not
personally i think the size of ur babies factor in the biggest size my sis had was 6lb mine was 7 14lb shes only gone full term once with the last baby and ive gone full term with all.
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:52 pm
have no idea.........thats wot tutors told us lat week. i'll find out though tomorrow now. ok??
i dont thinks its anything to do with the size of the babeis. i think its a combination of how much ur uterus stretches and the skin type.
i never said everybody in the family would have the same amount of stretchmrks, i said its hereditory. which means that stretcmarks run through the family-u may have 2 u may have lots but their still hereditory
i will find out though
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:56 pm
i would have though if u have a smaller bump compared to a bigger bump the bigger one wud get more strech marks than the smaller one bit like blowing a ballon up when uv done a smiley face if make it big the face stretchs more but if its smaller it stretchs less.
i dont think that the creams work i think if ur gonna get them ur gonna get them but been young ur skin is more supple so u may not get them or may not get as many.so i was told neway
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
depends on the skin. my sister and i were prgnant at the same time. i was absolutely huge.put on6 stone and had an 8lb 2oz baby. not 1 scathmark in site...............
my sister, well u would have even known she was pregnant, gave birth 6 days after me, had a 5lb 3oz baby and was caked in them. all over her abdomen, her bum, the tops of her legs, her breasts- just like mum.
and shes only a few years older than me.
she used that stretch mark cream out of the avon which stains them a silvery colour. it made them dull but didnt make them disappear.